Combine language courses, speaking practice, and tutor feedback
Design input, spoken and written tasks, rubric-based feedback, revision, and live tutoring as one language-learning loop.
Model
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Input
Choose the description, approved document, recording, or existing lesson that should ground the result. The source stays visible while the draft is reviewed.
sourceInput
DescriptionBook or PDFVideos＋Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording - Step 02
Model
Record interviews, collect extended answers, and keep the original submission available during review.
courseModel
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 03
Speak or write
Ask the learner to apply one or two priorities while the context is still familiar.
practiceSpeak or write
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Rubric feedback
The teacher compares the first pass with the original work, changes the score where needed, writes final feedback, and decides what the learner receives.
practiceRubric feedback
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 05
Retry
A useful rubric explains which dimension the learner should improve instead of hiding everything in one score.
reviewRetry
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation. - Step 06
Tutor focus
Keep the schedule, participants, lesson materials, recording, notes, and follow-up work together instead of rebuilding context after the call.
liveTutor focus
Tue2814:00Live tutoring sessionEvidence review with AnnaRecording · notes · follow-up homework TeacherAnna S.Ben L.Join lesson
Separate fluency, accuracy, range, and task completion
A useful rubric explains which dimension the learner should improve instead of hiding everything in one score.
Use speaking and writing evidence
Record interviews, collect extended answers, and keep the original submission available during review.
Turn feedback into a retry
Ask the learner to apply one or two priorities while the context is still familiar.
Bring patterns into tutoring
Use recurring errors and confidence gaps to choose live practice rather than repeating the whole lesson.
Common questions
Who is the online language teaching platform designed for?
Design input, spoken and written tasks, rubric-based feedback, revision, and live tutoring as one language-learning loop. A useful rubric explains which dimension the learner should improve instead of hiding everything in one score.
What problem does the online language teaching platform solve?
Design input, spoken and written tasks, rubric-based feedback, revision, and live tutoring as one language-learning loop. Record interviews, collect extended answers, and keep the original submission available during review.
What happens between input and tutor focus?
The connected steps are Input → Model → Speak or write → Rubric feedback → Retry → Tutor focus. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.
Can I reuse existing material in the online language teaching platform?
A useful rubric explains which dimension the learner should improve instead of hiding everything in one score. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
Can teachers edit model before students see it?
Record interviews, collect extended answers, and keep the original submission available during review. Generated modules, lessons, exercises, criteria, scores, and feedback are saved as editable product objects rather than a block of text to copy elsewhere.
Does the online language teaching platform include human review?
Ask the learner to apply one or two priorities while the context is still familiar. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.
Can I test the online language teaching platform with a private draft first?
Use recurring errors and confidence gaps to choose live practice rather than repeating the whole lesson. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.