Manage a small online school without enterprise complexity
Coordinate teachers, roles, programmes, private access, finances, quality, and migration in a workspace built around teaching.
Add team
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Create school
Permissions, content ownership, enrolment, teacher handoffs, recurring lessons, and payments create risk before the team feels large.
sourceCreate school
DescriptionBook or PDFVideos＋Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording - Step 02
Add team
Directors send email invitations; the accepted registration keeps the email locked and applies the invited teacher role and school membership.
courseAdd team
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 03
Migrate programme
Use course, lesson, homework, assessment-criteria, and reporting patterns while preserving teacher judgement.
practiceMigrate programme
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Enrol learners
The original written, spoken, visual, or presentation response stays beside its transcript and assignment context, so evidence is never reduced to a score alone.
responseEnrol learners
AssignmentDefend the decision and name the largest uncertainty.▶02:14Student response“The strongest evidence supports option B, but the sample is still too narrow…”
Transcript ready - Step 05
Run teaching
Validate access, content, communication, and data before moving the next group.
reviewRun teaching
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation. - Step 06
Review quality
Permissions, content ownership, enrolment, teacher handoffs, recurring lessons, and payments create risk before the team feels large.
reviewReview quality
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation.
Small schools outgrow spreadsheets early
Permissions, content ownership, enrolment, teacher handoffs, recurring lessons, and payments create risk before the team feels large.
Invite teachers by email
Directors send email invitations; the accepted registration keeps the email locked and applies the invited teacher role and school membership.
Standardise reusable structures
Use course, lesson, homework, assessment-criteria, and reporting patterns while preserving teacher judgement.
Connect revenue and delivery
Set revenue-sharing terms and review finances next to the programmes that create them.
Migrate one programme at a time
Validate access, content, communication, and data before moving the next group.
Current school-operations scope
SubSchool connects programme ownership, course access, teacher accounts, collaborators, finance settings, and progress. It is not positioned here as an enterprise SIS.
- 01
Director sends a teacher invitation by email
- 02
Invitee registers with that email prefilled and locked
- 03
Invitation applies the teacher role and school membership
- 04
Assign author/curator collaborators to courses
Open the current school workspace
Use the director/teacher operations that exist today and keep enterprise SIS needs as a separate evaluation.
Common questions
What source formats can I use with school management?
Permissions, content ownership, enrolment, teacher handoffs, recurring lessons, and payments create risk before the team feels large. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
Does school management use my own material as context?
Permissions, content ownership, enrolment, teacher handoffs, recurring lessons, and payments create risk before the team feels large. The selected description, document, recording, lesson, or response remains the grounding context for the requested workflow.
Can I edit the output from school management?
Directors send email invitations; the accepted registration keeps the email locked and applies the invited teacher role and school membership. When the current product workflow creates a saved course, lesson, exercise set, score, or feedback item, the teacher can inspect the supported fields instead of relying on a public-tool output as an automatic import.
What happens to files and recordings uploaded for school management?
Only upload material you are authorised to process. Keep personal data to the minimum needed for the teaching task, review the result before sharing it, and follow your organisation’s retention and consent policy.
Can a teacher override the result from school management?
Use course, lesson, homework, assessment-criteria, and reporting patterns while preserving teacher judgement. AI can prepare or assess a supported first pass. The educator can inspect and change supported course, lesson, exercise, score, and feedback states; tutoring homework generated from authorised chat context is posted automatically and remains editable afterward.
Which subjects and languages work with school management?
Use course, lesson, homework, assessment-criteria, and reporting patterns while preserving teacher judgement. Support depends on the source quality and requested subject, so educators should review terminology, notation, cultural context, and assessment expectations before use.
How is school management priced?
AI usage is metered with the same SubSchool AI balance used by course, lesson, homework, and assessment workflows. You can keep drafts private and review the expected operation before publishing or assigning the result.
Can I use school management without publishing a public course?
Set revenue-sharing terms and review finances next to the programmes that create them. Course work can stay in the distinct draft state while it is reviewed. Private, public, and paid are separate course types rather than properties of the same draft.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.