Built for your workflow

Train people and evaluate real work—not just video completion

Turn approved internal material into courses, add role-based written, presentation, and interview assignments, and use structured first-pass assessment with accountable human review.

SubSchool
Private training pilot

Review evidence from real work

Private courseCustomer-support onboarding6 lessons · role-based scenariosPilot
Human reviewWritten escalation responseOriginal answer and criterion scoresNeeds review
How it works in SubSchool

Each step stays editable, visible, and connected

These product views use example data to show what the relevant account actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.

  1. Step 01

    Approved sources

    Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.

    Private training pilotPilot
    Private training pilot

    Approved sources

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
  2. Step 02

    Editable training

    Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.

    Private training pilotNeeds review
    Private training pilot

    Editable training

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
  3. Step 03

    Role task

    AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision.

    Private training pilotPilot
    Private training pilot

    Role task

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
  4. Step 04

    Evidence

    Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.

    Private training pilotNeeds review
    Private training pilot

    Evidence

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
  5. Step 05

    Human review

    Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.

    Private training pilotPilot
    Private training pilot

    Human review

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
  6. Step 06

    Programme update

    Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.

    Private training pilotNeeds review
    Private training pilot

    Programme update

    Private courseCustomer-support onboarding

    6 lessons · role-based scenarios

    Pilot
    Human reviewWritten escalation response

    Original answer and criterion scores

    Needs review
01

Turn internal knowledge into a maintainable programme

Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.

02

Ask for evidence of performance

Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.

03

Keep managers responsible for high-stakes decisions

AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision.

04

Pilot one workflow before scaling

Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.

Questions and limits

Common questions

Is SubSchool a full enterprise LMS or HR system?

No. The supported business use case is a focused private-training pilot with editable courses, assignments, learner evidence, and human-reviewed assessment.

What kinds of work can a training assignment collect?

Supported tasks can collect written responses, presentations, spoken interviews, photos, and other files relevant to the role.

Does AI make employment or high-stakes decisions?

No. AI can produce a criterion-level first pass. An accountable person reviews the original response, changes supported scores, and makes the final decision.

How should a team start?

Start with one approved training programme and a defined human-review workflow, then compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load.

Continue in SubSchool

Turn the page into a real teaching workflow

Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.

Discuss a pilot