Standardise tutoring operations without standardising every teacher
Coordinate tutors, requests, recurring lessons, recordings, follow-up work, parent communication, and progress across a small centre.
Tutor match
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Learner request
The original written, spoken, visual, or presentation response stays beside its transcript and assignment context, so evidence is never reduced to a score alone.
responseLearner request
AssignmentDefend the decision and name the largest uncertainty.▶02:14Student response“The strongest evidence supports option B, but the sample is still too narrow…”
Transcript ready - Step 02
Tutor match
Keep the schedule, participants, lesson materials, recording, notes, and follow-up work together instead of rebuilding context after the call.
liveTutor match
Tue2814:00Live tutoring sessionEvidence review with AnnaRecording · notes · follow-up homework TeacherAnna S.Ben L.Join lesson - Step 03
Recurring plan
Review programme structure, rubrics, feedback, and learner outcomes instead of measuring only lesson volume.
practiceRecurring plan
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Live lesson
Review the generated structure as real modules and lessons. Reorder, rename, add, or remove anything before students receive access.
courseLive lesson
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 05
Homework
Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.
practiceHomework
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 06
Quality review
Separate school ownership, teacher work, learner access, and administrative operations with explicit roles.
reviewQuality review
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation.
Protect context during tutor handoffs
The next tutor should see approved notes, materials, assigned work, and progress without searching through private messages.
Control who can do what
Separate school ownership, teacher work, learner access, and administrative operations with explicit roles.
Build repeatable quality checks
Review programme structure, rubrics, feedback, and learner outcomes instead of measuring only lesson volume.
Keep one-to-one teaching financially understandable
Connect recurring tutoring, course content, individual lessons, and revenue-sharing terms in the same operating model.
Common questions
How does SubSchool for tutoring centres help with everyday teaching or learning?
Coordinate tutors, requests, recurring lessons, recordings, follow-up work, parent communication, and progress across a small centre. The next tutor should see approved notes, materials, assigned work, and progress without searching through private messages.
What can I set up first in SubSchool for tutoring centres?
The connected steps are Learner request → Tutor match → Recurring plan → Live lesson → Homework → Quality review. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.
Can I bring existing courses, lessons, or recordings into SubSchool for tutoring centres?
The next tutor should see approved notes, materials, assigned work, and progress without searching through private messages. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
How does AI assessment work in SubSchool for tutoring centres?
Review programme structure, rubrics, feedback, and learner outcomes instead of measuring only lesson volume. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.
Can courses and student work stay private in SubSchool for tutoring centres?
Connect recurring tutoring, course content, individual lessons, and revenue-sharing terms in the same operating model. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.
Does SubSchool for tutoring centres support tutoring as well as courses?
Review programme structure, rubrics, feedback, and learner outcomes instead of measuring only lesson volume. Live lessons, recordings, follow-up practice, feedback, and learner progress can stay in the same connected workflow.
How do payments and access work in SubSchool for tutoring centres?
Connect recurring tutoring, course content, individual lessons, and revenue-sharing terms in the same operating model. Educators can choose public or private access and decide whether learners buy a full course, a smaller learning unit, or join through their school.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.