Teach maths, science, and technical subjects without formula screenshots
Keep notation, worked examples, structured practice, photo submissions, criteria, and teacher feedback editable across the learning workflow.
Worked example
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Technical source
Choose the description, approved document, recording, or existing lesson that should ground the result. The source stays visible while the draft is reviewed.
sourceTechnical source
DescriptionBook or PDFVideos＋Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording - Step 02
Worked example
Design tasks and rubrics around method, representation, justification, calculation, and checking.
courseWorked example
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 03
Guided practice
Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.
practiceGuided practice
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Independent solution
Automated review can identify possible criteria, but unclear handwriting, diagrams, or high-stakes conclusions need human judgement.
responseIndependent solution
AssignmentDefend the decision and name the largest uncertainty.▶02:14Student response“The strongest evidence supports option B, but the sample is still too narrow…”
Transcript ready - Step 05
Evidence review
Use mathematical and chemical notation next to prose, diagrams, assumptions, units, and accessibility text.
reviewEvidence review
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation. - Step 06
Retry
Design tasks and rubrics around method, representation, justification, calculation, and checking.
liveRetry
Tue2814:00Live tutoring sessionEvidence review with AnnaRecording · notes · follow-up homework TeacherAnna S.Ben L.Join lesson
Preserve technical meaning in the editor
Use mathematical and chemical notation next to prose, diagrams, assumptions, units, and accessibility text.
Show reasoning, not only the final value
Design tasks and rubrics around method, representation, justification, calculation, and checking.
Accept real learner work
Use typed explanations, photos, files, or presentations where the subject requires them.
Keep the teacher responsible for ambiguous evidence
Automated review can identify possible criteria, but unclear handwriting, diagrams, or high-stakes conclusions need human judgement.
Common questions
Who is the online STEM teaching platform designed for?
Keep notation, worked examples, structured practice, photo submissions, criteria, and teacher feedback editable across the learning workflow. Use mathematical and chemical notation next to prose, diagrams, assumptions, units, and accessibility text.
What problem does the online STEM teaching platform solve?
Keep notation, worked examples, structured practice, photo submissions, criteria, and teacher feedback editable across the learning workflow. Design tasks and rubrics around method, representation, justification, calculation, and checking.
What happens between technical source and retry?
The connected steps are Technical source → Worked example → Guided practice → Independent solution → Evidence review → Retry. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.
Can I reuse existing material in the online STEM teaching platform?
Use mathematical and chemical notation next to prose, diagrams, assumptions, units, and accessibility text. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
Can teachers edit worked example before students see it?
Design tasks and rubrics around method, representation, justification, calculation, and checking. Generated modules, lessons, exercises, criteria, scores, and feedback are saved as editable product objects rather than a block of text to copy elsewhere.
Does the online STEM teaching platform include human review?
Use typed explanations, photos, files, or presentations where the subject requires them. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.
Can I test the online STEM teaching platform with a private draft first?
Automated review can identify possible criteria, but unclear handwriting, diagrams, or high-stakes conclusions need human judgement. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.