Turn internal knowledge into training with evidence of performance
Convert approved material into courses, role tasks, open-ended evidence, reviewer feedback, and a maintainable programme.
Course
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Source material
Choose the description, approved document, recording, or existing lesson that should ground the result. The source stays visible while the draft is reviewed.
sourceSource material
DescriptionBook or PDFVideos＋Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording - Step 02
Course
Review the generated structure as real modules and lessons. Reorder, rename, add, or remove anything before students receive access.
courseCourse
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 03
Role task
Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.
practiceRole task
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Evidence
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one programme first.
responseEvidence
AssignmentDefend the decision and name the largest uncertainty.▶02:14Student response“The strongest evidence supports option B, but the sample is still too narrow…”
Transcript ready - Step 05
Human review
Define what a learner must decide, explain, demonstrate, or produce in the real role.
reviewHuman review
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation. - Step 06
Update
Use approved policies and material, record update ownership, and flag generated claims that need subject-matter review.
liveUpdate
Tue2814:00Live tutoring sessionEvidence review with AnnaRecording · notes · follow-up homework TeacherAnna S.Ben L.Join lesson
Training completion is not performance evidence
Define what a learner must decide, explain, demonstrate, or produce in the real role.
Keep internal sources traceable
Use approved policies and material, record update ownership, and flag generated claims that need subject-matter review.
Assess realistic responses
Use scenarios, presentations, interviews, or written work with explicit criteria.
Pilot before scaling
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one programme first.
Common questions
Who is the AI corporate training platform designed for?
Convert approved material into courses, role tasks, open-ended evidence, reviewer feedback, and a maintainable programme. Define what a learner must decide, explain, demonstrate, or produce in the real role.
What problem does the AI corporate training platform solve?
Convert approved material into courses, role tasks, open-ended evidence, reviewer feedback, and a maintainable programme. Use approved policies and material, record update ownership, and flag generated claims that need subject-matter review.
What happens between source material and update?
The connected steps are Source material → Course → Role task → Evidence → Human review → Update. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.
Can I reuse existing material in the AI corporate training platform?
Define what a learner must decide, explain, demonstrate, or produce in the real role. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
Can teachers edit course before students see it?
Use approved policies and material, record update ownership, and flag generated claims that need subject-matter review. Generated modules, lessons, exercises, criteria, scores, and feedback are saved as editable product objects rather than a block of text to copy elsewhere.
Does the AI corporate training platform include human review?
Use scenarios, presentations, interviews, or written work with explicit criteria. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.
Can I test the AI corporate training platform with a private draft first?
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one programme first. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.