AI rubric generator

Criteria and weights

• Claim and line of reasoning — 4
• Use of source evidence — 6
• Explanation of evidence — 5
• Organisation — 3
• Language and conventions — 2

Observable evidence

For “explanation of evidence”, the strongest level connects each quoted or paraphrased detail to the claim and addresses a relevant limitation.

Student-friendly wording

Show how each source detail supports your claim; do not leave evidence unexplained.

Vague-criterion warning

Replace “excellent argument” with evidence a reviewer can point to. Avoid rewarding confidence, length, or style unless they are part of the stated objective.

Criteria and weights

• Task completion and answer development — 5
• Comprehensibility — 5
• Range and control — 4
• Response organisation — 3
• Use of follow-up detail — 3

Strong performance descriptor

Answers all four questions, adds relevant detail, and remains understandable throughout. Errors may occur but rarely block meaning.

Student-friendly wording

Answer every question, add a reason or example, and organise each response so the listener can follow it.

Human-review trigger

Listen to the original audio whenever the transcript is uncertain or the evidence depends on pronunciation and comprehensibility.

Criteria and weights

• Scientific accuracy — 8
• Evidence and explanation — 5
• Model limitations — 3
• Response to questions — 2
• Communication — 2

Strong performance descriptor

Explains the model accurately, connects at least two pieces of evidence to the explanation, and names one limitation without claiming that the model proves more than it shows.

Student-friendly wording

Explain what the model shows, use evidence to support the explanation, and tell the audience one thing the model cannot represent.

Human-review trigger

The teacher checks whether a simplified statement is acceptable for Grade 9 and whether answers to questions reveal a misconception.