SubSchool
SubSchool
← All free toolsFree AI teaching tool

AI essay feedback for teachers

Draft criterion-specific feedback without making the teacher’s final assessment decision.

  • Useful output before signup
  • Powered by SubSchool’s Foundry AI integration
  • Editable result
01

Describe what you need

Remove the learner’s name and all personal information before pasting work. The public usage record does not store your input.

02

Your editable result

Complete the form to see a practical result here.

Examples visible before signup

Worked examples you can inspect and prefill

Every example is fictional, available in the page HTML, and waits for you to press Generate or Calculate.

Worked example

Short argumentative essay feedback

Upper-secondary learner revising a 450-word argument

Example
Input
  • Anonymised excerpt
  • Criteria: claim, evidence, explanation
  • Feedback only—not a final grade

Evidence observed

The response states a clear claim and uses one relevant detail from the provided source.

Possible issue

The source detail is followed by a conclusion, but the reasoning that connects them is implicit.

Actionable revision

Add one sentence explaining why the source detail makes the claim more likely, then test whether a limitation changes that reasoning.

Requires teacher judgement

Whether the selected evidence is sufficient for this task and how much weight the missing explanation should carry.

Review before use: Compare feedback with the original prompt and criteria; remove anything that invents evidence or reads as a final grade.

Review before use

What to review before using the result

  • Feedback cites observed evidence
  • Issues are framed as possible and specific
  • Revision actions are manageable
  • No invented facts or final-grade language
  • Teacher judgement is named where evidence is ambiguous
Questions specific to this tool

Review questions before you continue

Is AI essay feedback a final grade?

No. This public tool drafts criterion-specific feedback. A teacher should inspect the original response, context, and rubric before any final assessment decision.

What should I remove before pasting learner writing?

Remove names, contact details, school identifiers, and unnecessary personal or sensitive information. Use only material you are authorised to process.

Connected resources
GuideReview evidence and feedback decisionsTemplateCopy the homework rubric templateProduct workflowSee lesson-grounded homework generationRelated toolCreate a measurable rubricRelated toolBuild a printable worksheet
Useful next step

Review supported submissions with teacher control

SubSchool can provide an AI first pass for supported essay and interview responses; the teacher can inspect, change, or confirm the result.

See AI-assisted reviewOpen teacher progress and review
Continue in the product

Review supported submissions in SubSchool

This public result is not imported or saved in SubSchool automatically. Copy it, then use the matching authenticated editor or workflow to create the supported product entities.

See how it worksStart in SubSchool
FAQ

Is this output ready to publish or assign?

No. Treat generated content as an editable first draft. Check accuracy, level, examples, accessibility, and fit with your learners before use.

Is learner data stored?

The public usage record stores usage and cost metadata, not your input. Remove names and identifying information before submitting learner work.

Why is there a free limit?

It keeps expensive AI generation available for genuine evaluation. After the anonymous allowance, sign in and continue through the same AI balance used in SubSchool.